Spoon87 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 This thread is quite funny. On topic:Freddie Mercury should be Number 1.Go watch the "Live at Wembley '86" DVD if you still need proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GivenToFly Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketQueen1985 Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 Here are several valid reasons why my opinion has some credibility over those 'thousands of people' from a website I've never heard of. 1. Bono knows how to keep a band. Axl cannot. 2. Bono knows how to keep his music original, fresh and relevant. Axl cannot. 3. Bono knows how to sell out stadiums everywhere including the USA, Axl cannot. 4. Bono has been continuing his success since the 1980s. Axl has not. 5. Bono and U2 have written more than two commercially successful albums. Axl has not. 6. Bono shows up on time and keeps his fans. Axl has not. The list goes on.And yet Axl is the one people prefer. I think Axl deserves the #1 spot. But I will agree with Nikki Sixx though: Where is Vince Neil on that list? He should at least be on it even if it was last spot on the list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lithium Posted December 25, 2010 Share Posted December 25, 2010 What kind of list is this? Someone link me, please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Caller Posted December 25, 2010 Author Share Posted December 25, 2010 Here are several valid reasons why my opinion has some credibility over those 'thousands of people' from a website I've never heard of. 1. Bono knows how to keep a band. Axl cannot. 2. Bono knows how to keep his music original, fresh and relevant. Axl cannot. 3. Bono knows how to sell out stadiums everywhere including the USA, Axl cannot. 4. Bono has been continuing his success since the 1980s. Axl has not. 5. Bono and U2 have written more than two commercially successful albums. Axl has not. 6. Bono shows up on time and keeps his fans. Axl has not. The list goes on.And yet Axl is the one people prefer. I think Axl deserves the #1 spot. But I will agree with Nikki Sixx though: Where is Vince Neil on that list? He should at least be on it even if it was last spot on the list.As I already stated Music Radar doesn't mean shit. Never heard of the website before it was posted here an neither did you. Just some shitty little site trying to make a name for itself. Next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butters Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Of course Bono is the best frontman of all-time, but nobody could touch Axl from 87-93. What he did on stage was mind blowing. I have seen u2 over 20 times and they are the best live band of alltime, but Axl is an artist from an different era. Axl kinda trancends pop culture in a way. By the way Axl turned me on the U2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GivenToFly Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Look, I'm ok with U2, but it's hard not to want to punch this face: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Caller Posted December 26, 2010 Author Share Posted December 26, 2010 Look, I'm ok with U2, but it's hard not to want to punch this face:Is it because you're jealous of how amazing and successful he is as a musician? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdHeartBreaker Posted December 27, 2010 Share Posted December 27, 2010 lolStupid thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.