bacardimayne Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 (edited) slash should re-record afd with izzy, myles, todd and brentUYI too. Show us what his "ideal version" would sound like. Edited February 19, 2013 by bacardimayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeez Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 I don't really see the point of re-recording a masterpiece. Axl should only focus on new music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedalus Posted February 19, 2013 Share Posted February 19, 2013 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimb0 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I think he only did that to get the band to sync up and be ready to play the songs live. The new line up has already played it to death and recorded it in rehearsals. The only point would be to get Axl up to par with the rest of the band but it would be a huge waste of time seeing as they can't even get in the studio as it is. Rumor has it, Team Brazil won't pay the 'employees' to record new material in the studio.If they record anything in the studio it should be as a live band. Fuck that cut and paste bullshit it ruined CD. The Blues always sounded better live than in does on the CD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeBaZ Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 He must re record The Wall (2cds) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr420 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 I think Axl should try something new and have them re-record Lies.If that was a joke it's really fuckin funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Why did he do that? I don't see the point other than to redirect royalties but I'm sure most people would still buy the original, even new fans.It was to get those guys up to the standard to play live. Also it has a mind game element. I dont think they ever consider releasing it. Figaro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen8R Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 He probably has already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 you guys speculate that he didn't really intend to release any of it, in spite of the fact that he released one song and tried to release others. except that nobody wanted to license nugnr covering old gnr songs. sure, axl likes to explain away this crazy choice by saying it was to get the band ready or to rehearse the old songs... but that's bullshit. just like it was bullshit when he claimed oh my god was a demo that somehow got released to a movie soundtrack. if axl wanted to rehearse playing the old songs live, he'd have just done that. recording an album is a completely different process. and if it was necessary to rerecord albums in order to learn how to play songs, then how come he hasn't done it again with this line up? how come other bands don't do that too?axl went to great lengths to try and fuck those he thought had fucked him. he learned the hardway that there was little demand for nugnr. and even less demand for nugnr rerecording old gnr tunes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roush Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 he learned the hardway that there was little demand for nugnr. and even less demand for nugnr rerecording old gnr tunes.So do you take your Haterade Martini shaken, or stirred? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 "boooooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooooooooo!!!!" - Roush's vagina, upon hearing people joke about Axl Rose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbo Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 you guys speculate that he didn't really intend to release any of it, in spite of the fact that he released one song and tried to release others. except that nobody wanted to license nugnr covering old gnr songs.sure, axl likes to explain away this crazy choice by saying it was to get the band ready or to rehearse the old songs... but that's bullshit. just like it was bullshit when he claimed oh my god was a demo that somehow got released to a movie soundtrack. if axl wanted to rehearse playing the old songs live, he'd have just done that. recording an album is a completely different process. and if it was necessary to rerecord albums in order to learn how to play songs, then how come he hasn't done it again with this line up? how come other bands don't do that too?axl went to great lengths to try and fuck those he thought had fucked him. he learned the hardway that there was little demand for nugnr. and even less demand for nugnr rerecording old gnr tunes.Exactly, I've been saying that forever. It's a buncha cop outs to help ease the major backlashes. I can't believe how gullible some can be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 yeah man, you can not argue that axl intended to keep these recordings in the band because one of the tracks was successfully licensed. how the hell would that have happened? someone from the production of big daddy got inside information that a nu line up of gnr had re-recorded sweet child o' mine, and somehow convinced axl to license it to them in spite of the fact that he had absolutely no desire to do so? he tried to license the nuband's welcome to the jungle too. it's not a secret. but i guess that's how cognitive dissonance works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roush Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 "boooooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooooooooo!!!!" - Roush's vagina, upon hearing people joke about Axl RoseDon't be silly. You couldn't possibly know what a vagina sounds like.Haters are only capable of two sounds:"Reunion", and "Uh-Howwk!" when they cough up Slash's whiskey-coated pubic hairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisRoyalSweetness Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 "boooooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooooooooo!!!!" - Roush's vagina, upon hearing people joke about Axl RoseDon't be silly. You couldn't possibly know what a vagina sounds like.because only fans of nugnr get laid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 The bucket line up did slightly more modern sounding versions. This band seems to do more faithful covers. I think Axl was feeling more pressire so wanted to prepare. The new guys come into a working band. Thats not to say Axl didnt want to release it. Hopefully we get to hear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magisme Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 "boooooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooooooooo!!!!" - Roush's vagina, upon hearing people joke about Axl RoseDon't be silly. You couldn't possibly know what a vagina sounds like.Haters are only capable of two sounds:"Reunion", and "Uh-Howwk!" when they cough up Slash's whiskey-coated pubic hairs.Are both of you in on the joke? Or is one not?This band and this forum have so many levels of parody and irony, I get confused sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovim Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) The Big Daddy scom thing was not that crazy of an idea. After all, Slash did something similar:https://www.youtube....h?v=nY3sxKjveU4Axl's reason for re-recording Appetite actually made sense to me: He wanted the musicians in his band at the time to capture the right energy of the material, learning the songs the way they were meant to be played.When I want to learn a cover, I record my guitar playing so I can hear if it's good enough. The new version of scom was not completely new, it represented both the old era and the new, as it contained not only the new band, but also the old in the first half of it if I'm not mistaken.Axl probably wanted the new band to be represented, so the new scom version was a compromise between the old and the new. Edited February 20, 2013 by Rovim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantomas Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 No. Not at all. Something new or don't bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 No. Not at all. Something new or don't bother.This, new material or fuck off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astranged Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Didn't Axl deny Old School and Black Hawk Down from using the old guns material instead pushing for a new version. I think this was in Slashs lawsuit basically saying shit or get off the pot. Old school with WTTJ woulda been awesome Edited February 20, 2013 by Astranged Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prettytiedup88 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Surely he re-recorded the album with the new band so none of the old members would get royalties if Appitite songs were used commercially i.e tv, film etc.Def Leppard have started to re-record their old tracks as a way of taking ownership away from a bad deal with the record label. By re-recording it gives Axl the opportunity to make more money and stick it to former members. Edited February 20, 2013 by prettytiedup88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Its possible, why not, at that time they were probably suing Axl for the name. Maybe that why they used that live Sweet child on Big daddy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcano62 Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 (edited) Surely he re-recorded the album with the new band so none of the old members would get royalties if Appitite songs were used commercially i.e tv, film etc.Def Leppard have started to re-record their old tracks as a way of taking ownership away from a bad deal with the record label. By re-recording it gives Axl the opportunity to make more money and stick it to former members.Def Leppard is a great example and I read their story. It makes perfect sense why they did it. Edited February 20, 2013 by volcano62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasted Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Is that why Love/Hate rerecorded most of their songs? i was a bit annoyed when i got the gh. Anyway this is the bitterest feud in rock history, VH seems crazier but GNR is the most petty and nasty. Cancer and Hacks the GNR reunjon tour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts