Blackstar Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 There is a new stipulation document between the lawyers that extends Axl's time to file a reply to Sheila Kennedy's opposition to May 22. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Didn't Axl already file some kind of opposition, something like,"I want Sheila Kennedy to stop harassing me and in fact, I want her to pay me damages for Libel and Slander? 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillConnor_1982 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 17 hours ago, Karice said: If Axl is forced to pay 100 Million, that's roughly HALF his net worth! 🥶😱😵💫😳 He better put out some records! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BangoSkank Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 No clue where this ends, it's turning into a cat & mouse game with both lawyers doing what they're paid to, which is do annoying lawyer things. I'm following the case, with big thanks again to @Blackstar, but I have to admit I still have absolutely no idea what to think about it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 2 hours ago, BangoSkank said: No clue where this ends, it's turning into a cat & mouse game with both lawyers doing what they're paid to, which is do annoying lawyer things. I'm following the case, with big thanks again to @Blackstar, but I have to admit I still have absolutely no idea what to think about it. Your Avatar perfectly matches your thoughts on the Sheila Kennedy and Axl Rose Lawsuit! 🤭💡🤔 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstar Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 Axl's lawyers have filed their reply to Sheila Kennedy's opposition to the motion to dismiss: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=Mz2PL8honzWHUMH9uf9CYA==&system=prod 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 23 hours ago, Blackstar said: Axl's lawyers have filed their reply to Sheila Kennedy's opposition to the motion to dismiss: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=Mz2PL8honzWHUMH9uf9CYA==&system=prod Wow, thanks for the update. 💡🤔 I skimmed it and Axl's Lawyers were like,"Miss Kennedy has made contradictory statements. She has claimed that she willingly had sex with Axl and then she said he raped her against her will and the sex was not consensual. She is a wishy washy person who cannot be trusted." 💡 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post cineater Posted May 24 Popular Post Share Posted May 24 Just seems like legal bullshit on the improper service. I wouldn't say justice had been served by throwing a case out for that. Seems to me, even though improper, Axl's lawyers are well aware of what that summons, lawsuit is all about. I know, the law isn't about what's right or wrong, fair or unfair, it's about following rules and procedures. Just kind of funny the leader of a band like GNR is going to hide behind rules and regs. I would expect more of "yeah I fucking got it and I'm coming after your ass for lying!" But maybe this is just a minor thing that's part of the bigger picture that says I'm proving you wrong on every fucking point and I am all over your ass. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 58 minutes ago, cineater said: Just seems like legal bullshit on the improper service. I wouldn't say justice had been served by throwing a case out for that. Seems to me, even though improper, Axl's lawyers are well aware of what that summons, lawsuit is all about. I know, the law isn't about what's right or wrong, fair or unfair, it's about following rules and procedures. Just kind of funny the leader of a band like GNR is going to hide behind rules and regs. I would expect more of "yeah I fucking got it and I'm coming after your ass for lying!" But maybe this is just a minor thing that's part of the bigger picture that says I'm proving you wrong on every fucking point and I am all over your ass. It has been reported that Axl asked Sheila to pay him for damages! LMAO! 😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avillart Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 11 hours ago, cineater said: Just seems like legal bullshit on the improper service. I wouldn't say justice had been served by throwing a case out for that. Seems to me, even though improper, Axl's lawyers are well aware of what that summons, lawsuit is all about. I know, the law isn't about what's right or wrong, fair or unfair, it's about following rules and procedures. Just kind of funny the leader of a band like GNR is going to hide behind rules and regs. I would expect more of "yeah I fucking got it and I'm coming after your ass for lying!" But maybe this is just a minor thing that's part of the bigger picture that says I'm proving you wrong on every fucking point and I am all over your ass. My sentiments exactly. But he better not word it that way cause being all over her ass (allegedly) got him into this mess in the first place... Her lawyers might take it as a confession LOL 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 16 hours ago, Avillart said: My sentiments exactly. But he better not word it that way cause being all over her ass (allegedly) got him into this mess in the first place... Her lawyers might take it as a confession LOL Technically, SHE claims she got into his ass by playing with his ass literally and making him orgasm! 🤣 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BangoSkank Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 Well, I'm certainly enlightened and will be reconsidering my view on what a door is. Anyway, thanks as always, @Blackstar. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 On 5/22/2024 at 10:36 PM, Blackstar said: Axl's lawyers have filed their reply to Sheila Kennedy's opposition to the motion to dismiss: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=Mz2PL8honzWHUMH9uf9CYA==&system=prod Did anyone else notice that the Lawsuit called Axl William Bruce Rose and NOT William Bruce Rose, Jr? 💡🤔 Technically, William Bruce Rose is Axl's FATHER. Axl has a Jr at the end of his biological name. 💡😵💫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avillart Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 48 minutes ago, Karice said: Did anyone else notice that the Lawsuit called Axl William Bruce Rose and NOT William Bruce Rose, Jr? 💡🤔 Technically, William Bruce Rose is Axl's FATHER. Axl has a Jr at the end of his biological name. 💡😵💫 That's what I've been thinking from the first time we got to see the documents. Coming from a family of lawyers, I know how every word matters, and in my view, Axl could've played them with this detail. He doesn't have to repsond to anything cause this case is not about him but about his father. Technically, he could ignore it all. Especially when you see how pedantic they are when it comes to their "Gate-or-Door"-Gate... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karice Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 2 hours ago, Avillart said: That's what I've been thinking from the first time we got to see the documents. Coming from a family of lawyers, I know how every word matters, and in my view, Axl could've played them with this detail. He doesn't have to repsond to anything cause this case is not about him but about his father. Technically, he could ignore it all. Especially when you see how pedantic they are when it comes to their "Gate-or-Door"-Gate... Yep, he could use this as a technical loophole. 😈 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstar Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 5 hours ago, Avillart said: That's what I've been thinking from the first time we got to see the documents. Coming from a family of lawyers, I know how every word matters, and in my view, Axl could've played them with this detail. He doesn't have to repsond to anything cause this case is not about him but about his father. Technically, he could ignore it all. Especially when you see how pedantic they are when it comes to their "Gate-or-Door"-Gate... I don't think the legal name matters in the U.S. civil law, as long as the person.defendant can be identified. Axl has been sued before as "William Bailey" and "William Bruce Rose". Moreover, in this case"William Bruce Rose" is the a/k/a for Axl Rose. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackstar Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 The hearing for Axl's motion to dismiss has been set for October 22, so after the status conference that will take place on September 24 (according to the schedule suggested by Axl and accepted by the judge, the discovery phase with the depositions etc. should have been completed by then). So this most likely means that the case is proceeding according to the schedule regardless of Axl's motion, but there won't be any public updates until September (because the depositions/testimonies are not among the documents that are made available for the public). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.