Sweersa Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 50 minutes ago, evilfacelessturtle said: Proving my point about MAGA projection. "Anyone that offends me is "offended", anyone that triggers me is "triggered", etc." The use of juvenile insults like "butthurt" also really says a lot. But it's the maturity level I've come to expect from MAGAs. Oh, so you're okay with social media websites, say, suppressing certain political stories? Like say, hypothetically about Hunter Biden for example? MAGAs really wanted to see those dick pics, apparently. Because that was what got taken down from Twitter when the Biden campaign asked if they would. They like to pretend it was some damning evidence of corruption but no, it was just illegally obtained and distributed revenge pornography that got taken down. Now count how many children's books depict straight families and relationships, how many TV shows have straight romance stories. Is that indoctrination into heterosexuality? By the right's logic, it would be (if their logic were actually consistent). Hell, the right actually creates camps to literally turn gay kids straight. The most literal definition of an indoctrination into a certain sexuality. Nothing remotely like that exists the other way around. If my son starts dating a girl, there is no "reformation camp" I can send him to until he's gay. EVERY ACCUSATION IS A CONFESSION. What a nightmare! Getting criticized is being forced to do something? Once again proving the right doesn't believe in free speech. Studies have repeatedly shown that suicidality comes from the very misgendering and mocking of them you are engaging in right here, and shown that acceptance drastically lowers it. The right wants trans men who are on testosterone to compete in women's sports. You want this guy competing in women's sports? It's shocking that more people don't realize the flip side of the coin because the right is always freaking out about trans women competing with women and having an unfair advantage. Trans men would have an even bigger advantage against cis women. Y'all haven't put a single minute of thought into this, you're just triggered by trans people and looking for any excuse to reject their identity. Meanwhile the right wants us to trip over our words to accommodate their "Christmas, not X-mas" bullshit if we forget to go along with their "lifestyle". I don't care what social media sites do, as long as it is lawful. My opinions are irrelevant, they shouldn't be controlled. It's dirty the left tried to shift them around, but that's what they do. Books have a right to promote whatever perversions they do, assuming it's lawful, I just think it is sick for them to try to normalize repulsive illnesses to children. I can have opinions, and express them, May God have mercy on those responsible. As for the rest of your filth, seek God. I don't have time to read all of that, nor would it be worth it if I did. I'm not going to change your mind, nor do I care to. I need to post more about Buckethead and Robin being on future GN'R releases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhazUp Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 54 minutes ago, evilfacelessturtle said: Proving my point about MAGA projection. "Anyone that offends me is "offended", anyone that triggers me is "triggered", etc." The use of juvenile insults like "butthurt" also really says a lot. But it's the maturity level I've come to expect from MAGAs. Oh, so you're okay with social media websites, say, suppressing certain political stories? Like say, hypothetically about Hunter Biden for example? MAGAs really wanted to see those dick pics, apparently. Because that was what got taken down from Twitter when the Biden campaign asked if they would. They like to pretend it was some damning evidence of corruption but no, it was just illegally obtained and distributed revenge pornography that got taken down. Now count how many children's books depict straight families and relationships, how many TV shows have straight romance stories. Is that indoctrination into heterosexuality? By the right's logic, it would be (if their logic were actually consistent). Hell, the right actually creates camps to literally turn gay kids straight. The most literal definition of an indoctrination into a certain sexuality. Nothing remotely like that exists the other way around. If my son starts dating a girl, there is no "reformation camp" I can send him to until he's gay. EVERY ACCUSATION IS A CONFESSION. What a nightmare! Getting criticized is being forced to do something? Once again proving the right doesn't believe in free speech. Studies have repeatedly shown that suicidality comes from the very misgendering and mocking of them you are engaging in right here, and shown that acceptance drastically lowers it. The right wants trans men who are on testosterone to compete in women's sports. You want this guy competing in women's sports? It's shocking that more people don't realize the flip side of the coin because the right is always freaking out about trans women competing with women and having an unfair advantage. Trans men would have an even bigger advantage against cis women. Y'all haven't put a single minute of thought into this, you're just triggered by trans people and looking for any excuse to reject their identity. Meanwhile the right wants us to trip over our words to accommodate their "Christmas, not X-mas" bullshit if we forget to go along with their "lifestyle". Well said, you beat me to the replying-punch there but a lot of what I would have said regarding a lot of that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhazUp Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, Sweersa said: Books have a right to promote whatever perversions they do, assuming it's lawful, I just think it is sick for them to try to normalize repulsive illnesses to children. I can have opinions, and express them, May God have mercy on those responsible. Just so we are clear - you are calling the concept of being transgender and/or homosexual as a "repulsive illness" in this case? Edited 4 hours ago by WhazUp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post janrichmond Posted 3 hours ago Popular Post Share Posted 3 hours ago I moved this thread here because it turned into a politics thread 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratam Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I realized it thread belong here.. November Rain... what❓ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweersa Posted 49 minutes ago Share Posted 49 minutes ago 3 hours ago, WhazUp said: Just so we are clear - you are calling the concept of being transgender and/or homosexual as a "repulsive illness" in this case? Homosexual, no. Transgender, probably. I don’t think it’s a coincidence so many an hero themselves, which is of course unfortunate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.