IzzySixx Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 i saw this album and couldn't belive my eyes it made me feel sickhow did they get away with it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1985 Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 That's the uncensored cover http://www.sleazeroxx.com/censored/virgin.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IzzySixx Posted March 8, 2005 Author Share Posted March 8, 2005 a right fair enoughbut why even think of using that for a cover?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 (edited) OMG the censored cover sucks ass.what's wrong with the other cover? Its kinda badass-kewl Edited March 8, 2005 by Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannebac Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 well they were pretty stupid if they thought they could use the naked ten year old as a cover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Boy Sixxx Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 theyd get screwed over for it these days. not exactly the most tastful cover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon87 Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 That's so sick... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightrain_Kid Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Fucking disgusting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_barker Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 disgusting bastards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulDisease Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 That cover make me sick. So disgusting, how could you come with a idea of a cover that looks like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genesis Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 I'm off to see them at the end of the month! Cool bunch of guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basketzero Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Yhea agree, that covers make me feel sick to my stomach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moreblack Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 (edited) good album though. But the original cover is going a bit too far. Edited March 8, 2005 by moreblack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray_TH Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Way bad cover choice. Still, if ithe album never got officially pressed in that cover then maybe Michael Jackson could use it for his next album... 20 years from now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
there is no dana only zool Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 hmm... you should have seen what spinal tap wanted to use for the cover of "smell the glove." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cold*heartbreaker Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Whoa there Scorpions. I wonder what would happen if something like that tried to come out today lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White_Mouse Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 You can call me an idiot but I think that cover just fuckin' rocks! I really do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pagge Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Whoa there Scorpions. I wonder what would happen if something like that tried to come out today lol. Just imagine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1985 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 The idea of using a naked child is not a good idea but it will draw more attention than the usual covers t in a record shop. Any publicity is good publicity, sort of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannebac Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 (edited) The idea of using a naked child is not a good idea but it will draw more attention than the usual covers t in a record shop. Any publicity is good publicity, sort of.I don't know.. being classifyed as pedofiles isnt something I would call good publicity Edited March 9, 2005 by Dannebac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genesis Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 well they were pretty stupid if they thought they could use the naked ten year old as a cover I had her down as more of an 11 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannebac Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 well they were pretty stupid if they thought they could use the naked ten year old as a coverI had her down as more of an 11 year old. sorry my mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopie85 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 WTF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.