Axl-rocks Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 (edited) Maybe this is the wrong section, I apologize if it is.But I was thinking if Slash and co didn't leave the band causing the break up when they did, would Guns n Roses still be together now? Edited January 19, 2006 by Axl-rocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssiscool Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 no they were not getting along but from what i can gather they stayed for the UYI tour and then they released Sypathy for the devil. but it all fell apart then. so come 1996 i think it was slash left then in 97 att and duff followedSS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimo85 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Maybe this is the wrong section, I apologize if it is.But I was thinking if Slash and co didn't leave the band causing the break up when they did, would Guns n Roses still be together now?Ive thought about that quite a bit. It was a matter of time before they broke up. Even if it was to get away from each other for a bit. They'd have broken up eventually coz they were all individually out of control in their own way. Whether it be egos, drink, drugs etc.Grimo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest swwet_child Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Probably not. I think they would have left sooner or later anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrari Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Maybe this is the wrong section, I apologize if it is.But I was thinking if Slash and co didn't leave the band causing the break up when they did, would Guns n Roses still be together now?Who knows ?There is only one thing for sure : now it's time for a reunion ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follow Your Illusion Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 'Will Guns n Roses still be together if they didn't break up'That is so poorly worded, of course they would be together if they didnt break up. It is implied by the non breaking up of the band! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axl-rocks Posted January 19, 2006 Author Share Posted January 19, 2006 (edited) 'Will Guns n Roses still be together if they didn't break up'That is so poorly worded, of course they would be together if they didnt break up. It is implied by the non breaking up of the band!no I said would Guns n Roses still be together now.edit: oh I see it now in the title I will change it. Edited January 19, 2006 by Axl-rocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duff_mckagan21 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I doubt it.dm21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cold_as_ice Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I don't think so. The would have probably realised CD in 1998 or 1999 then there would be a tour, some video clips...and that would be it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Axl Kev Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Will Guns n Roses still be together now if they didn't break upThat is terribly put. Of course they would be together now if they hadn't broken up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience 4 Axl Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 No. A BAND, by it's very nature, is a combination of musicians who share their talents and express their creativity. That was no longer allowed in Guns N' Roses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts