tbaugerud Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 did geffen cut off funds to gnr the reason i ask they have just adding geffen website to there site don't beleave me look http://www.gnronline.com/news/Dunno dude.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChineseDemocracy2004 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 so its slowly been refurbished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrealer Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 so its slowly been refurbishedI think the webmaster is only learning html basics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomase Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 so its slowly been refurbishedyup slowly it getting updateing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artfromtex Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 did geffen cut off funds to gnr the reason i ask they have just adding geffen website to there site don't beleave me look http://www.gnronline.com/news/may i suggest: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomase Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 did geffen cut off funds to gnr the reason i ask they have just adding geffen website to there site don't beleave me look http://www.gnronline.com/news/may i suggest: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrealer Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 did geffen cut off funds to gnr the reason i ask they have just adding geffen website to there site don't beleave me look http://www.gnronline.com/news/may i suggest: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madison Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 The strange thing about the whole update is that GNR's management isn't involved. When I contacted Merck on the day the site was updated to let him know some tour dates were missing, he wasn't even aware that the site had been updated. He said, "We have not updated that site and have no intention of doing so."So, I'm guessing people at the label are doing it by themselves. It's odd that they wouldn't get management's input though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomase Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 (edited) The strange thing about the whole update is that GNR's management isn't involved. When I contacted Merck on the day the site was updated to let him know some tour dates were missing, he wasn't even aware that the site had been updated. He said, "We have not updated that site and have no intention of doing so."So, I'm guessing people at the label are doing it by themselves. It's odd that they wouldn't get management's input though. hmmmmmmm werid and i geuss geffen is still funding gnr Edited August 29, 2006 by thomase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Manson Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 "We have not updated that site and have no intention of doing so."Shows how much they care about the fans then, eh? Thats why you should never trust people who are in control of things, they never think or care about the little people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicious Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 The strange thing about the whole update is that GNR's management isn't involved. When I contacted Merck on the day the site was updated to let him know some tour dates were missing, he wasn't even aware that the site had been updated. He said, "We have not updated that site and have no intention of doing so."So, I'm guessing people at the label are doing it by themselves. It's odd that they wouldn't get management's input though. no intention of doing so?am i the only one who think Merck isn't doing a good job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tippin Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 They have to have a new official website they're working on then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomase Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 They have to have a new official website they're working on then.i hope they do have a new website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 no intention of doing so?am i the only one who think Merck isn't doing a good job?Dont worry, sir. As long as 2005 will be the year of Guns N' Roses, Merck is doing fine job BTW: Madison, if Merck said THEY didn't update the site.... Does he know anything about that "gunsnroses.com" domain? The domain itself expires on November 26th, the registrant is W. AXL ROSE and the administrative contact is Doug Goldstein ... M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Manson Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 (edited) no intention of doing so?am i the only one who think Merck isn't doing a good job?Dont worry, sir. As long as 2005 will be the year of Guns N' Roses, Merck is doing fine job BTW: Madison, if Merck said THEY didn't update the site.... Does he know anything about that "gunsnroses.com" domain? The domain itself expires on November 26th, the registrant is W. AXL ROSE and the administrative contact is Doug Goldstein ... M.I dont think madison knows anymore than you do, she gets the same information as everyone else, "Form Letters" Edited August 29, 2006 by Charles Manson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Binge_And_Slash Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Notice merck say "We have not updated THAT website"Wishful thinking maybe, but he could be talking about another Gn'R one they have in the works.Or just about a band on Sanctuary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kollemann99 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I think there is a update again.http://www.gnronline.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Manson Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Whats the bet that GnRonline has been hacked also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kollemann99 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Whats the bet that GnRonline has been hacked also? :xmassrudolph: :xmassrudolph: I hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChineseDemocracy2004 Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 i hope the merchandise gets updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montrealer Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Whats the bet that GnRonline has been hacked also? Dude that would be the best thing to happen to that site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axl_rose_gnr Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mango Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 Whats the bet that GnRonline has been hacked also? Well, you must adore the hackers with correcting the featured show's layout and leaving the World Tour 2002 logo still above :xmasssanta: M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Manson Posted August 29, 2006 Share Posted August 29, 2006 I reckon if management "know nothing" of the update, then there's a chance that someone has hacked into it just like the recent gnr websites have been...And it seems that they aren't updating much, just tour dates. Because if anyone official were updating it, im pretty sure that site would need a lot more updating than that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmygod Posted August 29, 2006 Author Share Posted August 29, 2006 The strange thing about the whole update is that GNR's management isn't involved. When I contacted Merck on the day the site was updated to let him know some tour dates were missing, he wasn't even aware that the site had been updated. He said, "We have not updated that site and have no intention of doing so."So, I'm guessing people at the label are doing it by themselves. It's odd that they wouldn't get management's input though. maybe they are doin it themselves (slowly) because they are getting ready for a release : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts